JK Tyre challenges retrospective EPR liability, will pass on costs to customers

"There is an issue (retrospective imposition)  that we have taken up with the government," said Singhania, while hoping that the Centre will consider it going forward.

By Shahkar Abidi calendar 21 May 2024 Views icon4009 Views Share - Share to Facebook Share to Twitter Share to LinkedIn Share to Whatsapp
JK Tyre challenges retrospective EPR liability, will pass on costs to customers

JK Tyre has challenged the government's attempt to retroactively impose Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) norms on the industry, according to Dr. Raghupati Singhania, Chairman and Managing Director, in a post-results conference call. The company has, however, set aside Rs 106 crore to cover potential liabilities for the past two financial years, a cost that will likely be passed on to consumers. 

"There is an issue (retrospective imposition)  that we have taken up with the government," said Singhania, while hoping that the Centre will consider it going forward. "Now this costs money," he added before explaining that it will get passed on to the tyre users as it happens in other countries, including the US and EU. The top executive claims that all other manufacturers in the tyre industry are also expected to be taking similar steps.

EPR guidelines and recycling targets

The EPR guidelines, which came into effect in July 2022, set a recycling target of 70% of the weight of new tyres manufactured or imported in FY 2022 for FY24. This target increases to 100% in FY25 and subsequent years. Based on the quantity assigned in the EPR obligation, the producer will accordingly purchase an EPR certificate from a registered recycler.

A producer can also purchase a retreading certificate from the registered retreader for deferment of its EPR obligations. On submission of the EPR certification, the extended producer responsibility obligation shall be deferred by one year for the corresponding quantity of waste tyres. 

According to Singhania, as tyre producers, they are taking care of all the pollution created by them by disposing of and treating the materials. However, in the process of tyre consumption, when the emissions are created, who is responsible? Not the manufacturers, he emphasised. "So therefore, rightly, this obligation, if I may say so, ultimately rests on the consumer," he continued.

Helping transporters with cost savings

The EPR programme is expected to boost the retreading market, which offers significant cost savings for transporters, particularly the smaller ones. Retreading costs 20–50% of a new tyre due to the reuse of the casing, a key component accounting for roughly one-third of the tyre's total cost. Analysts suggest that retreading can be done two to three times while maintaining 80% of the quality of a new tyre, offering substantial economic benefits.

From an environmental standpoint, retreading reduces the carbon footprint by lowering the demand for crude oil derivatives and natural rubber.

RELATED ARTICLES
Neolite ZKW Positions for Growth as Lighting Becomes a Differentiator

auther Kiran Murali calendar17 Jan 2026

IPO-bound Neolite ZKW is scaling up manufacturing capacity and electronics capabilities as automotive lighting evolves f...

Vinfast in Talks With Battery Makers in India For Localisation

auther Kiran Murali calendar17 Jan 2026

The company is in talks with multiple cell manufacturers in India, including Tata-Gotion.

Gujarat, Maruti Suzuki Formalise Rs 35,000 Crore Investment for Khoraj Plant: ANI

auther Autocar Professional Bureau calendar17 Jan 2026

Facility to produce 10 lakh vehicles annually with potential for 12,000 jobs; ceremony attended by Chief Minister Bhupen...