Post-Geneva talks ease some restrictions, but processing monopoly and dual-use material controls continue to impact international markets
14 Jul 2025 | 1014 Views | By Angitha Suresh
China's export controls on rare earth elements continue to pose challenges for global supply chains, with seven of the 17 rare earth materials currently under export restrictions, according to analysis from Elara Securities. While material flows have resumed following Geneva talks, Beijing maintains control over dual-use materials that have defense ...
This is an Autocar Pro Plus article. Subscribe to continue reading.
China's export controls on rare earth elements continue to pose challenges for global supply chains, with seven of the 17 rare earth materials currently under export restrictions, according to analysis from Elara Securities. While material flows have resumed following Geneva talks, Beijing maintains control over dual-use materials that have defense applications.
The export approval process has improved, with timelines now ranging from 10 to 30 days compared to previous delays. However, the Chinese Ministry of Commerce continues to regulate approvals to prevent stockpiling, with materials often held at ports for customs testing to verify end-use applications.
China maintains a virtual monopoly on heavy rare earth processing, with only one company outside China—Lynas—capable of such operations. The Australian company processes materials in Malaysia and exports to Japan, while also planning to establish operations in Texas. Currently, 90 percent of light rare earths extracted in the United States are sent to China for processing.
The supply chain faces structural challenges beyond political considerations. Establishing rare earth extraction and processing operations requires two years minimum for licensing and exploration, with mining timelines extending to five to seven years due to financing and technical complexities. The processing phase presents the most technical challenges, as rare earths are chemically similar and require specialized equipment and expertise for separation.
Vietnam holds the second-highest resource availability globally, while Greenland is emerging as a potential source following regulatory reforms. Only one percent of rare earths are currently recycled, highlighting the industry's dependence on primary extraction.
The automotive sector appears most vulnerable to supply disruptions due to volume requirements, while defense applications can absorb risk premiums. Large electronics companies including Samsung, Google, and Apple maintain stronger bargaining positions in negotiations.
Export controls primarily target dual-use materials with defense applications, though China has attempted to expand classifications to include additional materials. The country banned exports of rare earth processing equipment several years ago, prompting companies like Lynas to develop their own manufacturing capabilities.
Smuggling has increased significantly as supply premiums for defense applications have risen tenfold, leading to longer license approval times. Classification challenges persist, with neodymium magnets containing controlled dysprosium affecting 98 percent of such products despite the magnets themselves not being subject to controls.
The rare earth supply chain remains vulnerable to both operational and policy disruptions. While global diversification efforts are underway, China's processing dominance means shifts in market share will be gradual and require substantial capital investment. For the automotive industry, which requires high volumes, supply security concerns remain elevated compared to other sectors.
India has emerged as a potential processing hub, though establishing operations typically requires three years with capital requirements dependent on ore quality. The country's talent pool in technical processing stands out compared to other potential alternatives to Chinese operations.
Beijing's export policy appears linked to broader trade tensions, with stronger responses to perceived U.S. aggression. China retains leverage through control of tungsten, titanium, beryllium, and magnesium, materials that face high prospects for future export controls.