Fiat Chrysler has a second chance to stop Mahindra 4x4s in trademark dispute

According to a Mahindra spokesperson, the company is optimistic that the case's result will be "compatible with the prior verdicts" in its favour.

Autocar Pro News Desk By Autocar Pro News Desk calendar 20 Sep 2022 Views icon3316 Views Share - Share to Facebook Share to Twitter Share to LinkedIn Share to Whatsapp

Fiat Chrysler, now a part of Stellantis, on Monday was given another chance to stop Mahindra & Mahindra’s redesigned Roxor off-road vehicles from being sold in the United States. M&M is contesting allegations that it copied Fiat Chrysler's Jeep design, Reuters has reported. 

The Detroit federal court's determination that Mahindra's post-2020 Roxors were unlikely to cause consumer confusion was deemed by the 6th US Circuit Court of Appeals to have used the incorrect test.

According to a Mahindra spokesperson, the company is optimistic that the case's result will be "compatible with the prior verdicts" in its favour. Stellantis NV, the parent company of Fiat Chrysler, declined to comment on the decision.  In 2018, Fiat Chrysler claimed Mahindra's Roxor design copied trademark-protected components of its Jeeps and filed a lawsuit against it in Michigan and before the U.S. International Trade Commission.

A Detroit federal court blocked Mahindra from selling pre-2020 Roxors, but rejected its bid to block sales of its redesigned version of the off-road-only vehicle. U.S. District Judge Gershwin Drain's decision was based on an ITC ruling that the Roxor did not infringe Fiat Chrysler's trademark rights because the average person would "know immediately" from looking at it that it is not a Jeep.

However, the 6th Circuit said on Monday that because M&M was already a known infringer, the court should have held it to a stricter standard. According to US Circuit Judge Helene White's reasoning for a three-judge panel, Mahindra's new design had to maintain a "safe distance" from Jeep designs. "Because a court can enjoin even a non-infringing product under the safe-distance rule, the simple fact that a known infringer's redesigned product is non-infringing does not support the conclusion that the safe-distance rule should not apply," White reportedly said. 

The appeals court remanded the matter to the Detroit court so that it could determine whether the new Roxors maintained a "safe distance" from the Jeep design.



BYD India delivers over 700 Atto 3 electric SUVs since January

auther Autocar Pro News Desk calendar23 Mar 2023

EV OEM sees growing demand for premium electric SUV which is assembled at its plant in Chennai.

Tata Motors to supply 1,000 XPres-T EVs to OHM E Logistics, FY2023 biz nears 50,000 units

auther Autocar Pro News Desk calendar22 Mar 2023

Twenty-one months after Tata Motors launched the fleet-only Xpres brand with a single product, the move is paying divide...

TVS Motor’s CSR arm to accelerate water conservation initiatives in rural India

auther Autocar Pro News Desk calendar22 Mar 2023

Since 2017, Srinivasan Services Trust has undertaken 350 desilting projects, helping increase water storage by 160 crore...