Fiat Chrysler has a second chance to stop Mahindra 4x4s in trademark dispute

According to a Mahindra spokesperson, the company is optimistic that the case's result will be "compatible with the prior verdicts" in its favour.

Autocar Pro News Desk By Autocar Pro News Desk calendar 20 Sep 2022 Views icon2371 Views Share - Share to Facebook Share to Twitter Share to LinkedIn Share to Whatsapp
Fiat Chrysler has a second chance to stop Mahindra 4x4s in trademark dispute

Fiat Chrysler, now a part of Stellantis, on Monday was given another chance to stop Mahindra & Mahindra’s redesigned Roxor off-road vehicles from being sold in the United States. M&M is contesting allegations that it copied Fiat Chrysler's Jeep design, Reuters has reported. 

The Detroit federal court's determination that Mahindra's post-2020 Roxors were unlikely to cause consumer confusion was deemed by the 6th US Circuit Court of Appeals to have used the incorrect test.

According to a Mahindra spokesperson, the company is optimistic that the case's result will be "compatible with the prior verdicts" in its favour. Stellantis NV, the parent company of Fiat Chrysler, declined to comment on the decision.  In 2018, Fiat Chrysler claimed Mahindra's Roxor design copied trademark-protected components of its Jeeps and filed a lawsuit against it in Michigan and before the U.S. International Trade Commission.

A Detroit federal court blocked Mahindra from selling pre-2020 Roxors, but rejected its bid to block sales of its redesigned version of the off-road-only vehicle. U.S. District Judge Gershwin Drain's decision was based on an ITC ruling that the Roxor did not infringe Fiat Chrysler's trademark rights because the average person would "know immediately" from looking at it that it is not a Jeep.

However, the 6th Circuit said on Monday that because M&M was already a known infringer, the court should have held it to a stricter standard. According to US Circuit Judge Helene White's reasoning for a three-judge panel, Mahindra's new design had to maintain a "safe distance" from Jeep designs. "Because a court can enjoin even a non-infringing product under the safe-distance rule, the simple fact that a known infringer's redesigned product is non-infringing does not support the conclusion that the safe-distance rule should not apply," White reportedly said. 

The appeals court remanded the matter to the Detroit court so that it could determine whether the new Roxors maintained a "safe distance" from the Jeep design.

 

 

RELATED ARTICLES
Exclusive: Petr Janeba to succeed Petr Solc as Skoda India's new brand director 

auther Autocar Pro News Desk calendar05 Dec 2023

Janeba will have a tough task of building volumes with a mass-market small SUV still about 15 months away but he is like...

JCB debuts hydrogen technology in India with eco-friendly backhoe loader

auther Autocar Pro News Desk calendar05 Dec 2023

Transport minister Nitin Gadkari unveils prototype JCB backhoe loader powered by a purpose-engineered hydrogen combustio...

Bridgestone India eyes 25% PCR aftermarket share by 2030

auther Autocar Pro News Desk calendar05 Dec 2023

The tyre maker, which currently has a 20 percent share of the passenger car radial (PCR) category in the aftermarket tyr...