TVS Motor Company Divests Stake in ION Mobility, Acquires Assets for USD 1.75 Million

ION Mobility, previously an associate as per the audited financial statements for FY 2023-24, contributed ₹73.67 crore to TVS Motor’s net worth during that period.

31 Mar 2025 | 8349 Views | By Arunima Pal

Leading two-wheeler manufacturer, TVS Motor Company Limited announced today that its wholly-owned subsidiary, TVS Motor (Singapore) Pte Ltd. (TVSM Singapore), has divested its stake in ION Mobility Pte. Ltd., a Singapore-based associate company. The transaction, completed today, involved TVSM Singapore exchanging its equity in ION Mobility for identified assets from the company, with a net cash consideration of approximately USD 1.75 million. 

According to the company’s submission, ION Mobility, previously an associate as per the audited financial statements for FY 2023-24, contributed ₹73.67 crore to TVS Motor’s net worth during that period. However, as an associate entity, its revenue was not consolidated line-by-line into TVS Motor’s financials. The divestment marks the end of ION Mobility’s status as an associate of both TVSM Singapore and TVS Motor Company. The transaction was valued based on a report from an independent valuer, ensuring transparency in the process.

The share transfer agreement and the completion of the deal both occurred on March 31, 2025, as outlined in the company’s Annexure I disclosure. The buyers in this transaction include ION Mobility itself and its promoter, Chan Lianghong James. TVS Motor clarified that neither ION Mobility nor Chan Lianghong James are part of the promoter or promoter group of TVS Motor, ruling out any related party affiliations. Furthermore, the company emphasized that the transaction was conducted at arm’s length, despite not qualifying as a related party transaction under regulatory definitions.

TVS Motor also confirmed that the divestment and asset acquisition do not fall under the category of a sale, lease, or disposal of an undertaking outside a Scheme of Arrangement, rendering compliance with Regulation 37A of the LODR Regulations inapplicable. Similarly, the company clarified that the transaction does not classify as a slump sale, and thus, no additional disclosures related to amalgamation or merger were required.

RELATED ARTICLES

Suzuki Edges Past Honda to Become Japan's Second-Largest Automaker by Global Sales

Autocar Professional Bureau 31 Oct 2026

A surge in India lifts Suzuki to a record half-year, while Toyota posts its first fiscal first-half decline in two years...

Studds Accessories Q2 Revenue Up 19%, Profit Falls 28% as Costs Outpace Sales

Arunima Pal 31 Oct 2026

Studds’ sales climb 19% on strong helmet demand, but a 28% drop in quarterly profit shows how costly growth has become.

Atul Auto Q2 Consolidated Revenue Jumps 34%, Profit Slips 17% as Costs Climb

Arunima Pal 31 Oct 2026

Atul Auto’s three-wheeler volumes surge 29% and revenue climbs 34%, but rising material and operating costs cut quarterl...

NEXT STORY