The government suspended many quality control orders, making it easier both for importers as well as manufacturers, including those in the auto sector.
29 Jan 2026 | 209 Views | By Shruti Shiraguppi
The Economic Survey 2025-26 has offered significant reassurance to India’s auto component industry by explicitly acknowledging that indiscriminate regulatory interventions have harmed downstream manufacturing, and by noting that such measures have now been paused.
In a clear reference to recent regulatory disruptions, the Survey states that “indiscriminate Quality Control ...
This is an Autocar Pro Plus article. Subscribe to continue reading.
The Economic Survey 2025-26 has offered significant reassurance to India’s auto component industry by explicitly acknowledging that indiscriminate regulatory interventions have harmed downstream manufacturing, and by noting that such measures have now been paused.
In a clear reference to recent regulatory disruptions, the Survey states that “indiscriminate Quality Control Orders, which adversely affected downstream industries, were put on hold.” This acknowledgement is important for the automobile ecosystem, where hundreds of micro, small and medium enterprises supply components such as bearings, fasteners, electrical parts, castings and forgings.
Auto component manufacturers had repeatedly flagged that sudden Quality Control Orders (QCOs), often notified with short implementation timelines, disrupted production cycles, delayed imports of specialised inputs, and raised compliance costs disproportionately for MSMEs. Many suppliers operate on thin margins and depend on just-in-time inventory systems linked to large OEMs.
By explicitly conceding that QCOs harmed downstream industries, the Survey signals a shift away from a one-size-fits-all regulatory approach. The Survey’s language suggests that regulatory discipline must be balanced against competitiveness and supply-chain continuity, particularly in complex manufacturing ecosystems like automobiles.
This pause is especially relevant at a time when the auto sector is navigating multiple transitions simultaneously — including tighter emission norms, localisation of electronics, and the shift toward electric vehicles. Compliance overload, industry executives argue, risks weakening smaller suppliers precisely when scale, speed and cost discipline are most needed.
The Survey’s broader industrial policy framework reinforces this stance. It cautions against policy actions that unintentionally penalise downstream firms, noting that competitiveness must be preserved across the value chain rather than concentrated only at upstream stages.
For the auto sector, the implicit message is that future quality and standards regulation is likely to be more sequenced, consultative and risk-based. While the Survey does not rule out QCOs altogether, its acknowledgement of past damage gives industry stakeholders confidence that regulatory predictability will be restored.